Migrate from Informatica to Fivetran

Complete Step-by-Step Guide (2026)

Migrating from Informatica to Fivetran represents a shift from a powerful but complex enterprise platform to a simpler, cloud-native integration solution. While Informatica is known for advanced transformation and governance, Fivetran specializes in fast, reliable data loading with minimal configuration. This guide covers the tactical steps to decompose Informatica workflows into Fivetran connectors.

Why Migrate to Fivetran?

Teams migrate from Informatica to Fivetran primarily for operational simplicity and cost reduction. Informatica requires significant IT overhead (infrastructure, licenses, maintenance), while Fivetran is fully managed and consumption-based. If your Informatica use case is primarily cloud ELT (data movement rather than complex transformations), Fivetran offers 3-5x faster time-to-value. However, Informatica's governance, lineage tracking, and advanced transformation capabilities are unmatched—only migrate if you don't need them. This migration is most relevant for teams using Informatica only for cloud-to-warehouse syncing without heavy transformation logic.

Step-by-Step Migration Process

1. Audit Informatica Configurations

8-16 hours

Document all active Informatica workflows, mappings, and source/target connections. Identify which workflows are pure data movement (candidates for Fivetran) vs. those with complex transformations (keep in Informatica or refactor). Export connection metadata. Note any custom transformations, aggregations, or data quality rules embedded in mappings.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Informatica's metadata is complex—allow time to navigate the repository
  • Custom transformations (REST API calls, SQL, JavaScript) may not map to Fivetran—identify these early

2. Categorize Workflows: Migration vs. Keep

4-6 hours

Sort workflows into two buckets: (1) candidates for Fivetran (simple source→warehouse syncs) and (2) keep in Informatica or refactor elsewhere. Pure data movement workflows with light transformation are ideal migration targets. Complex transformations belong in dbt, Informatica, or specialized tools.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Overestimating what Fivetran can handle leads to rework—be conservative about transformation complexity
  • Some workflows may have hidden dependencies on Informatica's session logic—trace these carefully

3. Design Data Movement Architecture

2-4 hours

For Fivetran-bound workflows, sketch how data will flow: source → Fivetran → warehouse → dbt (for transformation). Separate concerns: Fivetran handles loading, dbt handles transformation, Informatica (if needed) handles governance/lineage. Document the new architecture.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Mixing Informatica and Fivetran can be confusing—clearly document which tool handles what
  • Data quality checks may need to move from Informatica mappings to dbt tests

4. Create Fivetran Workspace and Connections

1-2 hours

Set up Fivetran account and workspace. Create connections for your data sources (Salesforce, Postgres, Snowflake, etc.). Create connections for your warehouse destination. Test each connection with a simple query.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Fivetran requires explicit IP whitelisting for some sources—verify network rules are in place
  • Warehouse credentials must have appropriate schema/table creation permissions

5. Migrate First Workflow

2-4 hours

Select the simplest Informatica workflow (ideally a single source→table mapping). Create the equivalent Fivetran connector. Configure table selection, column filtering, and sync mode (full vs. incremental). Test the sync. Compare outputs with the original Informatica run.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Column ordering and data types may differ between Informatica and Fivetran—normalize if needed
  • Informatica's incremental logic may differ from Fivetran's cursor-based approach—test carefully

6. Set Up Transformation Layer (dbt)

4-8 hours

If your migrated workflows include transformations, move them to dbt. Create dbt models that reference Fivetran-loaded tables. Test dbt runs. Set up dbt to run after Fivetran syncs complete (via Fivetran webhooks or orchestration tool).

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • dbt models need to be written from scratch (no auto-conversion from Informatica mappings)
  • Schedule dbt runs after Fivetran syncs; timing mismatches cause data freshness issues

7. Migrate Remaining Workflows

2-4 hours per workflow

Progressively migrate remaining Informatica workflows to Fivetran. Start with simple ones and work toward complex. For each, validate data matches the original Informatica output. Document any custom logic that couldn't be migrated.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Mid-size migrations can plateau—early workflows are easy, later ones may have hidden complexity
  • Some Informatica-specific patterns (like dynamic file processing) don't map to Fivetran—plan alternatives

8. Decommission Informatica Workflows

1-2 hours

Once all data movement is in Fivetran, disable or remove the corresponding Informatica workflows. Keep Informatica running for governance/lineage or complex transformations if needed. Document which Informatica components are still in use.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Don't delete Informatica workflows immediately—archive them for 2-4 weeks for recovery if needed
  • Informatica licenses are often bundled—verify you're freeing up capacity if you reduce deployment size

9. Run Parallel Validation

8-16 hours (over 1-2 weeks)

Before final cutover, run both Informatica and Fivetran pipelines in parallel for 1-2 full cycles. Compare record counts, data accuracy, and timing. Validate that downstream reporting and dashboards match expectations with Fivetran data.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • Timing differences (Informatica runs at midnight; Fivetran at 6am) make comparison tricky—align schedules temporarily
  • Historical data mismatches often stem from incremental sync cursor differences—investigate thoroughly

10. Production Cutover and Optimization

2-4 hours

Finalize cutover by retiring old Informatica workflows from the critical path. Update SLAs and alerting for Fivetran. Monitor costs for first month (MAR-based pricing). Optimize sync schedules and column selection to manage costs. Document lessons learned.

⚠️ Watch Out For:

  • First month of Fivetran costs can surprise if you don't optimize large tables—review data volume closely
  • Team may still reference Informatica documentation—update wikis and runbooks proactively

Feature Mapping: Informatica → Fivetran

Informatica Feature Fivetran Equivalent Notes
Session/Workflow Connector + Job Informatica's session concept maps loosely to Fivetran connector + schedule.
Mapping/Transformation dbt models Informatica's transformations should move to dbt. Fivetran is for loading only.
Source Qualifier SQL filter in Fivetran Use Fivetran's table selection and column filtering for simple source qualification.
Incremental detection Cursor-based incremental sync Informatica's change detection differs from Fivetran's cursor approach—requires careful mapping.
Data quality rules dbt tests + Great Expectations Informatica's validation logic moves to dbt tests or external data quality tools.
Workflow scheduling Fivetran schedule + orchestrator (Airflow/dbt Cloud) Informatica's scheduler is powerful but complex; Fivetran + orchestrator is simpler.
Metadata/Lineage dbt docs + data lineage tool Informatica's lineage is richer but closed; move to open-source tools like dbt for transparency.
Licensing Consumption-based (MAR) Informatica: fixed licenses. Fivetran: pay-per-row. Costs shift with data volume.

Key Gotchas to Watch

Architectural Mismatch

⚠️ Informatica is a comprehensive platform (ETL, governance, lineage); Fivetran is an ELT specialist. Migrating wholesale requires decomposing Informatica's layers across multiple tools.

Mitigation: Be selective about what you migrate. Keep Informatica for governance/lineage if those are critical. Use Fivetran + dbt for data movement + transformation. Avoid a false equivalence between the two platforms.

Complex Transformations

⚠️ If your Informatica workflows embed significant transformation logic (aggregations, joins, complex expressions), rewriting them in dbt is time-consuming and error-prone.

Mitigation: Prioritize migrating simple workflows first. For complex transformations, evaluate the effort: is it worth rewriting, or should you keep using Informatica for those specific pipelines?

Incremental Sync Differences

⚠️ Informatica's change data capture (CDC) and incremental detection differ from Fivetran's cursor-based approach. Misalignment causes data gaps or duplicates.

Mitigation: Test incremental syncs thoroughly with small data samples first. Document the cursor field for each source. Run full refreshes initially until you're confident in incremental logic.

Metadata and Lineage Loss

⚠️ Informatica's metadata repository is comprehensive and exportable; Fivetran provides less detailed lineage out of the box. You may lose visibility during migration.

Mitigation: Before decommissioning Informatica, export metadata and store it for reference. Set up dbt docs and a data lineage tool (like dbt Cloud or Collibra) to maintain lineage in Fivetran-based pipelines.

Operational Knowledge Gap

⚠️ Your team is likely expert in Informatica's UI, session management, and debugging. Fivetran and dbt operate differently—expect a learning curve.

Mitigation: Plan team training on Fivetran and dbt. Assign subject-matter experts to champion the migration. Maintain Informatica documentation for reference during transition.

Licensing and Cost Timing

⚠️ Informatica licenses are typically annual and front-loaded. Switching to Fivetran's consumption-based pricing changes your cost structure and may be higher short-term.

Mitigation: Model 12-month costs for both platforms before committing. Account for Fivetran's data volume growth. Consider keeping Informatica for 3-6 months during transition if licenses are already paid.

Last updated: Jun 17, 2026